In a very study conducted by the Survey of Occupational Injuries and Diseases (SOII), it absolutely was revealed that 4.7 million industrially connected eye injuries were reported in 2002. This is an alarming variety considering that a worker’s vision is the primary sense that he uses for his supply of living.
What is even a lot of alarming is the ratio between the aforementioned variety of eye injuries and the number of workers utilized in the private sector. Almost vi staff out of one hundred can doubtless suffer an eye fixed injury, based mostly on the trend established by the statistic mentioned above.
The Most “Eye-Unfriendly” Industries
Out of the 4.7 million staff who suffered eye injuries in 2002, majority of them came from a pair of industrial sectors: the producing sector, and the services industry. The manufacturing sector accounted for 52% of the eye injury cases for that year. On the other hand, the services industry accounted for 20% of the said cases.
The construction trade ran a close third, with 16% of eye injury cases happening during this sector. This can be quite a surprise, considering the serious machineries, riskier tasks, and plentiful perils that a construction employee has to measure with. Most individuals tend to believe that the construction trade would be the foremost “eye-unfriendly” labor sector today.
Most of the attention injury victims are males, as they account for 81% of the whole variety of cases. sixty one% belong to the twenty five to thirty four, and 35 to 44 age groups.
A chunk of fine news: eighty seven% of these cases are thought of slight or less grave.
But, 4% of such cases led to permanent loss of vision.
The Inevitable Conclusion
From the unhappy statistics we tend to have mentioned higher than, we will be sure of two things:
1. Workplace eye injuries DO happen, and that they happen a lot of often than expected
2. Industries should impose stricter measures to shield the eyes of their workers
Some sectors do create eye protection mandatory, but the bulk of the industries that contribute to the alarmingly huge percentage of eye injuries per annum don’t impose such measures.
If the protection of the staff’ vision is to be salvaged, state legislations should be passed that can make it mandatory for bound industries to need their laborers to wear sufficient eye protection gear. The protective eyewear should be provided by the businesses themselves.
Better nonetheless, these firms will initiate such moves. They will, without compulsion from any statute or ordinance, take heed of the statistics concerning eye injuries per year and take it upon themselves to impose eye protection measures for the good thing about their number one investments: their employees.